Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

ptet2016results.in

Ptet2017.com Rajasthan PTET 2017 application form

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

124 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

157 ms

About Website

Welcome to ptet2016results.in homepage info - get ready to check PTET 2016results best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about ptet2016results.in

PTET 2017 Results, PTET 2017 application form download,ptet results 2017, ptetraj2017.org results,www.ptetraj2017.com , rajasthan ptet 2017 name wise results, ptet 2017 rollwise results download, ptet...

Visit ptet2016results.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Ptet2016results.in page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ptet2016results.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.ptet2017results.in

124 ms

3730162741-widget_css_bundle.css

35 ms

css

34 ms

jquery.min.js

21 ms

adsbygoogle.js

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ptet2016results.in, 13% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 13% (7 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (248 ms) relates to the external source 4.bp.blogspot.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 385.7 kB (48%)

Content Size

802.1 kB

After Optimization

416.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Ptet2016results.in main page is 802.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 663.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 48.9 kB

  • Original 60.6 kB
  • After minification 54.2 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 69.3 kB
  • After minification 65.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PTET 2016results images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 333.0 kB

  • Original 663.7 kB
  • After minification 663.6 kB
  • After compression 330.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 333.0 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 8.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (60%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PTET 2016results. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

ptet2016results.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ptet2016results.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ptet2016results.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PTET 2016results. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: