Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

purefeed.com

Horse Feed by Pure Feed | Carefully Formulated by Equine Scientists.

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

21 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

About Website

Welcome to purefeed.com homepage info - get ready to check Pure Feed best content right away, or after learning these important things about purefeed.com

High-quality, natural horse feed, carefully formulated by equine scientists. Good value complete feed. Available in store or delivered to your door.

Visit purefeed.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Purefeed.com page load time and found that the first response time was 21 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

purefeed.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,930 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

purefeed.com

21 ms

purefeed.com

350 ms

www.purefeed.com

3253 ms

siteground-optimizer-combined-css-f2c621932071e8f8d67efe1f2771e580.css

67 ms

all.css

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Purefeed.com, 17% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Purefeed.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 505.7 kB (56%)

Content Size

896.8 kB

After Optimization

391.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Purefeed.com main page is 896.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 412.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 234.0 kB

  • Original 284.8 kB
  • After minification 270.3 kB
  • After compression 50.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 234.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 457 B

  • Original 4.0 kB
  • After minification 3.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pure Feed needs image optimization as it can save up to 457 B or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 93.4 kB

  • Original 412.2 kB
  • After minification 412.0 kB
  • After compression 318.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 93.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 177.8 kB

  • Original 195.7 kB
  • After minification 18.0 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Purefeed.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 177.8 kB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (83%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pure Feed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 77 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

purefeed.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

purefeed.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

purefeed.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Purefeed.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Purefeed.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pure Feed. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: