Access puretexture.com. Decorative Concrete Training Seminars at Pure Texture

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.639

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.1 s

4/100

10%

www.puretexture.com

359 ms

js

71 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

63 ms

style.min.css

119 ms

font-awesome.min.css

168 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Puretexture.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (733 ms) belongs to the original domain Puretexture.com.

Content Size

17.3 MB

After Optimization

16.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Puretexture.com main page is 17.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 17.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 35.2 kB

Original 45.4 kB
After minification 42.6 kB
After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 879.7 kB

Original 17.0 MB
After minification 16.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pure Texture images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

Original 155.2 kB
After minification 155.2 kB
After compression 151.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

Original 82.6 kB
After minification 82.6 kB
After compression 77.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Puretexture.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pure Texture. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.