Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

strom.preisvergleich.de

Strompreisvergleich 2023 ᐅ️ 1. Platz Preise | PREISVERGLEICH.de

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

285 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

659 ms

About Website

Welcome to strom.preisvergleich.de homepage info - get ready to check Strom PREISVERGLEICH best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about strom.preisvergleich.de

Jetzt Strompreisvergleich für 2023 nutzen + Sofortbonus erhalten ✅ kostenlos ✅ einfacher Wechsel ✅ super günstiger Strom ✓ auf PREISVERGLEICH.de

Visit strom.preisvergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Strom.preisvergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

strom.preisvergleich.de performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,690 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.047

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

strom.preisvergleich.de

285 ms

strom.preisvergleich.de

521 ms

app.pid.js

464 ms

143709267.js

434 ms

gtm.js

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Strom.preisvergleich.de, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn.priv.center. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Strom.preisvergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 247.5 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

827.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Strom.preisvergleich.de main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 670.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 220.4 kB

  • Original 259.2 kB
  • After minification 258.7 kB
  • After compression 38.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 220.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 19.9 kB

  • Original 670.5 kB
  • After minification 650.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Strom PREISVERGLEICH images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 145.7 kB
  • After minification 145.7 kB
  • After compression 138.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (53%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Strom PREISVERGLEICH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

strom.preisvergleich.de accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

strom.preisvergleich.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

strom.preisvergleich.de SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Strom.preisvergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Strom.preisvergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Strom PREISVERGLEICH. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: