Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

qit.am

NOSE.AM — профессиональная ринопластика — «Глаза мамины, нос от Геворга Юрьевича»

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

403 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

483 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Qit content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qit.am

Меня зовут Геворг Егиазарян, я пластический хирург. Первым в Армении начал работать по пьезотехнологии. Несколько лет подряд получаю премию «лучший хирург Армении». Раз в месяц оперирую бесплатно.

Visit qit.am

Key Findings

We analyzed Qit.am page load time and found that the first response time was 403 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qit.am performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.3 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qit.am

403 ms

nose.am

1111 ms

sbi-sprite.png

320 ms

logo_main_white.svg

377 ms

logo_main_white_short.svg

380 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Qit.am, 98% (44 requests) were made to Nose.am. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Nose.am.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 463.5 kB (8%)

Content Size

5.7 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Qit.am main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 462.6 kB

  • Original 553.2 kB
  • After minification 552.9 kB
  • After compression 90.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 462.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 916 B

  • Original 5.1 MB
  • After minification 5.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qit images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

40

  • Images

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qit. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

qit.am accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

qit.am best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

qit.am SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qit.am can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qit.am main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: