Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

racechoice.com

Performance Auto Parts, Racing Car Parts & Safety Gear | RaceChoice

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

78 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

323 ms

About Website

Welcome to racechoice.com homepage info - get ready to check Race Choice best content right away, or after learning these important things about racechoice.com

RaceChoice is the best place to provide Quality Racing Safety & Performance Parts from the Best Brands in the world at Affordable Prices. Free shipping on orders over $99.

Visit racechoice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Racechoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

racechoice.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,180 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.301

39/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

racechoice.com

78 ms

racechoice.com

509 ms

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

85 ms

theme-bundle.head_async.js

85 ms

css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Racechoice.com, 25% (14 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com and 18% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (509 ms) belongs to the original domain Racechoice.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 446.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Racechoice.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 848.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 402.0 kB

  • Original 435.6 kB
  • After minification 329.1 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 106.4 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 402.0 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 850 B

  • Original 848.4 kB
  • After minification 847.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Race Choice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 43.1 kB

  • Original 163.1 kB
  • After minification 162.0 kB
  • After compression 120.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (66%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Race Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

racechoice.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

racechoice.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

racechoice.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Racechoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Racechoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Race Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: