Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

radiantmark.com

Every great design begins with a Radiant Mark.

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Radiant Mark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about radiantmark.com

Every design we create begins with a Radiant Mark. All our designs begin in our sketchbook, ensuring you receive a unique and standout design. We specialize in creating effective graphic designs and m...

Visit radiantmark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Radiantmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radiantmark.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radiantmark.com

29 ms

radiantmark.com

34 ms

webfont.js

100 ms

style.min.css

93 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Radiantmark.com, 43% (53 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 19% (24 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 771.4 kB (27%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Radiantmark.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 149.9 kB

  • Original 176.9 kB
  • After minification 174.7 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 14 B

  • Original 812.8 kB
  • After minification 812.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Radiant Mark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 610.7 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB
  • After compression 1.1 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 610.7 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 131.3 kB
  • After minification 131.3 kB
  • After compression 120.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radiantmark.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (74%)

Requests Now

114

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 114 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radiant Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 67 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

radiantmark.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

radiantmark.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

radiantmark.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radiantmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radiantmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Radiant Mark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: