Access railscarma.com. Ruby on Rails (RoR) Development Company in USA, INDIA

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,670 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

railscarma.com

145 ms

www.railscarma.com

319 ms

style.min.css

268 ms

main.css

22 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

179 ms

Our browser made a total of 167 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (127 requests) were addressed to the original Railscarma.com, 10% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Railscarma.com.

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Railscarma.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 268.5 kB

Original 314.7 kB
After minification 314.6 kB
After compression 46.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 268.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 458.7 kB

Original 3.0 MB
After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rails Carma needs image optimization as it can save up to 458.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 27.1 kB

Original 387.4 kB
After minification 387.4 kB
After compression 360.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

Original 188.5 kB
After minification 187.8 kB
After compression 183.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Railscarma.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

144

After Optimization

The browser has sent 144 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rails Carma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.