Access rasteroids.com. Rasteroids Design | San Jose Website Design & Development Studio

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value880 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.081

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

rasteroids.com

82 ms

rxYNlZHTyT4GqgS4YlInwe-RiqUWqYS6oieJpBXtqKJfeC9IfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9uZcFyZQyRZQsKw26XwR4R526aFRwoFyntMKG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0ScBDiemkdh8qSkoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCHKoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0dcmXOeBDOcu8OeUzjhBC-eNDifUkjWFXZW4z-AsDOcFzdPUkjWFXZW4z-AsDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOYiaikoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80Zko0ZWbCiaiaOcBDOcu8OYiaikokjWFXZW4z-AsDOcFzdPUaiaS0ScBDiemkdh8qSkoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCiaiaO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8ShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXK2YgkdayTdAIldcNhjPJ4Z1mXiW4yOWgXH6qJn3IbMg6IJMJ7f6K3UMIbMg6BJMJ7fbKlMsMMeMj6MKG4fJCgIMMjgkMfH6qJCMIbMg65JMJ7fbKwMsMMegI6MKG4fJZmIMIjMkMfH6qJyB9bMs6IJMJ7fbRxmgMgeM96MKG4fJBmIMIjgkMfH6qJ6B9bMs6VJMJ7fbKfmsMgegI6MTMgljVpNb9.js

84 ms

css2

103 ms

legacy.js

107 ms

modern.js

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rasteroids.com, 45% (20 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 20% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (936 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Rasteroids.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 117.7 kB

Original 133.1 kB
After minification 121.3 kB
After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 455 B

Original 1.7 MB
After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rasteroids images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 1.0 MB
After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rasteroids. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.