Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

ratekit.com

Star ratings PHP jQuery plugin | RateKit | Home

Page Load Speed

598 ms in total

First Response

65 ms

Resources Loaded

402 ms

Page Rendered

131 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rate Kit content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ratekit.com

Want your site's visitors to leave star ratings? Find out how you can add them effortlessly with RateKit - an easy-to-use, ultra low maintenance PHP and jQuery plugin.

Visit ratekit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ratekit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 65 ms and then it took 533 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ratekit.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ratekit.com

65 ms

ratekit.com

59 ms

bootstrap.css

48 ms

star-rating.css

56 ms

ratekit.css

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Ratekit.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (152 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.rawgit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 29.9 kB (26%)

Content Size

113.1 kB

After Optimization

83.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Ratekit.com main page is 113.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 57.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 16.4 kB
  • After minification 15.9 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 57.7 kB
  • After minification 57.7 kB
  • After compression 56.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 39.0 kB
  • After minification 34.8 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ratekit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (53%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rate Kit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ratekit.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

ratekit.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ratekit.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ratekit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ratekit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rate Kit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: