Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 43

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    39% of websites

ratingtoken.net

RatingToken: Blockchain Rating Agency - list of projects with rating and review

Page Load Speed

16.6 sec in total

First Response

25 ms

Resources Loaded

16.3 sec

Page Rendered

224 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rating Token content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ratingtoken.net

Rating the complete lists of blockchain projects with historical data. Top coin and token list with review and analysis.

Visit ratingtoken.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ratingtoken.net page load time and found that the first response time was 25 ms and then it took 16.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ratingtoken.net performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value41.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ratingtoken.net

25 ms

ratingtoken.net

2190 ms

www.ratingtoken.net

24 ms

www.ratingtoken.net

1052 ms

polyfill.min.js

1100 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Ratingtoken.net, 10% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ratingtoken.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 101.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

852.5 kB

After Optimization

750.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Ratingtoken.net main page is 852.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 420.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 81.2 kB

  • Original 104.9 kB
  • After minification 103.9 kB
  • After compression 23.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 420.6 kB
  • After minification 402.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rating Token images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 266.9 kB
  • After minification 266.8 kB
  • After compression 264.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 60.2 kB
  • After minification 60.2 kB
  • After compression 60.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ratingtoken.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (23%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rating Token. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ratingtoken.net accessibility score

43

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ratingtoken.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ratingtoken.net SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ratingtoken.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ratingtoken.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rating Token. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: