Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

raw.cat

Site en construction

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

461 ms

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

647 ms

About Website

Welcome to raw.cat homepage info - get ready to check Raw best content right away, or after learning these important things about raw.cat

raw fotografia - manresa

Visit raw.cat

Key Findings

We analyzed Raw.cat page load time and found that the first response time was 461 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raw.cat performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.073

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raw.cat

461 ms

css

25 ms

general.css

205 ms

jquery.js

423 ms

raw.css

210 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Raw.cat, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Raw.cat.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 349.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Raw.cat main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 38.5 kB

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 40.6 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 217.2 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raw images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 85.4 kB

  • Original 137.8 kB
  • After minification 128.6 kB
  • After compression 52.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 10.9 kB
  • After minification 8.5 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raw.cat needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (7%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

67

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

raw.cat accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

raw.cat best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

raw.cat SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raw.cat can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Raw.cat main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Raw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: