Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

raysync.cloud

镭速大文件传输-企业大文件传输软件,文件传输工具,跨国快速传输大文件,企业大数据传输解决方案

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

688 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

512 ms

About Website

Visit raysync.cloud now to see the best up-to-date Raysync content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about raysync.cloud

镭速企业大文件传输软件,大文件传输解决方案,高速文件传输工具,解决企业远距离传输大型文件,国外大文件传输,大数据传输,跨国大文件传输慢的问题,帮助企业提高文件传输效率,亦提供ftp传输加速服务。

Visit raysync.cloud

Key Findings

We analyzed Raysync.cloud page load time and found that the first response time was 688 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raysync.cloud performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,120 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raysync.cloud

688 ms

www.raysync.io

1141 ms

gtm.js

75 ms

________1_.png

32 ms

webpack-runtime-7dd56dceffa115021622.js

248 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Raysync.cloud, 39% (14 requests) were made to Raysync.io and 25% (9 requests) were made to Images.ctfassets.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Raysync.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 778.5 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

983.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Raysync.cloud main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 864.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 124.7 kB

  • Original 171.8 kB
  • After minification 171.6 kB
  • After compression 47.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 55.5 kB

  • Original 725.8 kB
  • After minification 670.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raysync images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 598.3 kB

  • Original 864.1 kB
  • After minification 864.1 kB
  • After compression 265.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 598.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (32%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raysync. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

raysync.cloud accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

raysync.cloud best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

raysync.cloud SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raysync.cloud can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Raysync.cloud main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Raysync. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: