Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

re-screeningpro.com

Re-Screening Pro – Fort Myers, Cape Coral, Naples, FL

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

8.6 sec

Page Rendered

576 ms

About Website

Visit re-screeningpro.com now to see the best up-to-date Re Screening Pro content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about re-screeningpro.com

Pool screen repair, pool enclosure repair, rescreening, and more in Fort Myers, Cape Coral, Naples, North Fort Myers, and SWFL. Call today for quality, affordable service from the best pros around.

Visit re-screeningpro.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Re-screeningpro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

re-screeningpro.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

re-screeningpro.com

60 ms

re-screeningpro.com

86 ms

viewpage.asp

1663 ms

css2

43 ms

css2

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Re-screeningpro.com, 46% (41 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 24% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 808.6 kB (32%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Re-screeningpro.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 760.9 kB

  • Original 804.9 kB
  • After minification 786.0 kB
  • After compression 44.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 760.9 kB or 95% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Re Screening Pro images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 173.8 kB
  • After minification 173.8 kB
  • After compression 158.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 555 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.7 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Re-screeningpro.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 555 B or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (77%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Screening Pro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

re-screeningpro.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

re-screeningpro.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

re-screeningpro.com SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Re-screeningpro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Re-screeningpro.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Re Screening Pro. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: