Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 72

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

rebiga.net

e书吧 - 免费小说阅读,每日更新

Page Load Speed

22.9 sec in total

First Response

269 ms

Resources Loaded

21.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

About Website

Welcome to rebiga.net homepage info - get ready to check Rebiga best content right away, or after learning these important things about rebiga.net

e书吧为广大读者提供热门小说在线免费阅读,本站收集的网络文学小说情节跌宕起伏,e书吧是值得书友们收藏的小说在线阅读网。

Visit rebiga.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rebiga.net page load time and found that the first response time was 269 ms and then it took 22.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

rebiga.net performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rebiga.net

269 ms

vb

547 ms

841 ms

mwaextraedit2settings.js

169 ms

gradient.js

170 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Rebiga.net, 1% (1 request) were made to Heznah.com and 1% (1 request) were made to M5zn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.9 sec) relates to the external source Im78.gulfup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 330.4 kB (84%)

Content Size

393.5 kB

After Optimization

63.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Rebiga.net main page is 393.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 221.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 197.5 kB

  • Original 221.1 kB
  • After minification 210.4 kB
  • After compression 23.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 94.6 kB

  • Original 131.9 kB
  • After minification 116.1 kB
  • After compression 37.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 94.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

  • Original 40.4 kB
  • After minification 33.8 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rebiga.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 95% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (59%)

Requests Now

91

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rebiga. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rebiga.net accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rebiga.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rebiga.net SEO score

72

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    AR

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1256

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rebiga.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Arabic language. Our system also found out that Rebiga.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1256. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rebiga. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: