Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

recall.com

Data & Records Management | Shredding | Iron Mountain

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

532 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

942 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Recall content for Thailand. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about recall.com

Iron Mountain provides solutions for records management, data backup and recovery, document management, secure shredding, and data centers.

Visit recall.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Recall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 532 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

recall.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.recall.com

532 ms

app.css

101 ms

all.css

58 ms

roi.css

60 ms

main.css

129 ms

Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Recall.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Recall.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (62%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

967.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Recall.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 75.9 kB

  • Original 88.1 kB
  • After minification 70.7 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 556.8 kB
  • After minification 519.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Recall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 374.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 389.8 kB

  • Original 451.1 kB
  • After minification 370.1 kB
  • After compression 61.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Recall.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 389.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 78 (74%)

Requests Now

106

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Recall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

recall.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Recall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Recall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Recall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: