Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

receptix.us

Receptix: Programmatic Job Advertising Platform, Find Remote Vacancies

Page Load Speed

973 ms in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

575 ms

Page Rendered

339 ms

About Website

Visit receptix.us now to see the best up-to-date Receptix content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about receptix.us

Programmatic Job advertising platform, offering millions of remote job vacancies from around the world. Find your dream job with Receptix now.

Visit receptix.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Receptix.us page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 914 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

receptix.us performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.326

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

receptix.us

59 ms

www.receptix.us

68 ms

bootstrap.min.css

47 ms

app.css

91 ms

js

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Receptix.us, 9% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (179 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.6 kB (23%)

Content Size

295.4 kB

After Optimization

226.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Receptix.us main page is 295.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 125.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 56.8 kB

  • Original 66.3 kB
  • After minification 43.7 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.6 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 125.7 kB
  • After minification 115.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Receptix images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 66.3 kB
  • After minification 66.2 kB
  • After compression 65.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 383 B

  • Original 37.1 kB
  • After minification 37.1 kB
  • After compression 36.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Receptix.us has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (28%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Receptix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

receptix.us accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

receptix.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

receptix.us SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Receptix.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Receptix.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Receptix. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: