Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

recroup.com

Recruitment Marketing & Advanced Recruitment Analytics

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

192 ms

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

253 ms

About Website

Visit recroup.com now to see the best up-to-date Recroup content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about recroup.com

Reach and convert the right candidates using Recroup's recruitment marketing and advanced recruitment analytics tools. Start your free trial today!

Visit recroup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Recroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

recroup.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

recroup.com

192 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

50 ms

minify-b1-bxslider-css-396eda03b39bc3ab3e129f18e35358c5.css

72 ms

css

37 ms

css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Recroup.com, 34% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 17% (8 requests) were made to D960kgagv20ho.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) relates to the external source D960kgagv20ho.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 458.5 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Recroup.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 691.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 73.1 kB

  • Original 90.1 kB
  • After minification 84.3 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 633.2 kB
  • After minification 621.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Recroup images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 344.3 kB

  • Original 691.4 kB
  • After minification 691.4 kB
  • After compression 347.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 344.3 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 96.9 kB
  • After minification 96.8 kB
  • After compression 67.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Recroup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (58%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Recroup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

recroup.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

recroup.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

recroup.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Recroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Recroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Recroup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: