Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

redseal.net

RedSeal | Network Exposure Management

Page Load Speed

523 ms in total

First Response

171 ms

Resources Loaded

286 ms

Page Rendered

66 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Red Seal content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about redseal.net

RedSeal’s network exposure management solution simplifies and accelerates cybersecurity and compliance efforts.

Visit redseal.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Redseal.net page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 352 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Redseal.net rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

redseal.net performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

redseal.net

171 ms

main.css

14 ms

beacon.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Redseal.net, 33% (1 request) were made to Performance.radar.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (171 ms) belongs to the original domain Redseal.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.4 kB (46%)

Content Size

7.5 kB

After Optimization

4.1 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Redseal.net main page is 7.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 5.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 5.3 kB
  • After minification 4.9 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 13 B

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Redseal.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • CSS

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Red Seal. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

redseal.net accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

redseal.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

redseal.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redseal.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Redseal.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Red Seal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: