Access reesdynamicwebdesign.com. Web Design Cape Town | Website Designers South Africa

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

reesdynamicwebdesign.com

36 ms

websolutionsdesk.com

420 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

8 ms

css2

46 ms

all.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Reesdynamicwebdesign.com, 87% (34 requests) were made to Websolutionsdesk.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (420 ms) relates to the external source Websolutionsdesk.com.

Content Size

572.8 kB

After Optimization

300.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Reesdynamicwebdesign.com main page is 572.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 424.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

Original 30.2 kB
After minification 28.5 kB
After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 248.6 kB

Original 424.1 kB
After minification 175.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reesdynamic Web Design needs image optimization as it can save up to 248.6 kB or 59% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 251 B

Original 96.0 kB
After minification 96.0 kB
After compression 95.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 22.4 kB
After minification 22.4 kB
After compression 22.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reesdynamicwebdesign.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reesdynamic Web Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.