Access rejuvenate.digital. Digital Agency Leeds. Web, Apps, Video & Digital Marketing

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

rejuvenate.digital

191 ms

rejuvenate.digital

320 ms

www.rejuvenate.digital

906 ms

js

58 ms

jquery.min.js

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Rejuvenate.digital, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rejuvenate.digital.

Content Size

43.2 MB

After Optimization

11.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Rejuvenate.digital main page is 43.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 42.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 140.4 kB

Original 162.2 kB
After minification 150.1 kB
After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 31.3 MB

Original 42.7 MB
After minification 11.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rejuvenate needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.3 MB or 73% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 254.4 kB
After minification 254.4 kB
After compression 254.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 221 B

Original 16.9 kB
After minification 16.9 kB
After compression 16.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rejuvenate.digital has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rejuvenate. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.