Access remup.ru. Remup - Разборка и ремонт ноутбука, статьи и советы. Сервисное обслуживание и ремонт ноутбуков, Санк...

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

58/100

10%

remup.ru

456 ms

www.remup.ru

472 ms

typography.php

134 ms

style.css

208 ms

style.css

209 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Remup.ru, 7% (4 requests) were made to Site.yandex.net and 5% (3 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.7 sec) relates to the external source Counter.rambler.ru.

Content Size

422.0 kB

After Optimization

254.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Remup.ru main page is 422.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 300.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

Original 64.7 kB
After minification 63.7 kB
After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

Original 46.0 kB
After minification 38.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Remup needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 105.8 kB

Original 300.3 kB
After minification 300.2 kB
After compression 194.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 105.8 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

Original 11.1 kB
After minification 11.1 kB
After compression 7.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remup.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.