Access reno.ee. Renoveerimine ja rekonstrueerimine

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,670 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

reno.ee

393 ms

reno.ee

852 ms

1-80x80.png

98 ms

20151217_120850-scaled.jpg

124 ms

4-e1711034868265.png

633 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Reno.ee, 47% (38 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 23% (19 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Reno.ee.

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Reno.ee main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 118.3 kB

Original 146.1 kB
After minification 143.5 kB
After compression 27.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 21 B

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reno images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 97 B

Original 363.5 kB
After minification 363.5 kB
After compression 363.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reno. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.