Access renostar.eu. Renostar Kanzleisoftware

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,020 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.207

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.7 s

0/100

10%

renostar.eu

666 ms

www.renostar.de

2094 ms

uc.js

139 ms

wpa.css

176 ms

style.min.css

347 ms

Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Renostar.eu, 73% (94 requests) were made to Renostar.de and 18% (23 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.5 sec) relates to the external source Renostar.de.

Content Size

9.3 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Renostar.eu main page is 9.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 184.9 kB

Original 215.4 kB
After minification 189.3 kB
After compression 30.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 6.1 MB

Original 8.6 MB
After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Renostar needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.1 MB or 71% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 95.9 kB

Original 371.2 kB
After minification 371.2 kB
After compression 275.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 95.9 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

Original 158.9 kB
After minification 158.9 kB
After compression 157.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Renostar.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Renostar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.