4 sec in total
369 ms
3.2 sec
356 ms
Click here to check amazing Repete content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about repete.com
Repete designs and supports feed mill automation software and plant-wide automated control system solutions for companies in the Americas, Europe and Asia.
Visit repete.comWe analyzed Repete.com page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
repete.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
369 ms
497 ms
204 ms
178 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Repete.com, 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Repete.com.
Page size can be reduced by 401.1 kB (44%)
914.7 kB
513.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Repete.com main page is 914.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 409.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 162.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Repete images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 221.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.6 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Repete.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (73%)
105
28
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Repete. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
repete.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
repete.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
repete.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Repete.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Repete.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
repete.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Repete. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: