Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

reply.io

Reply.io | AI Sales Outreach & Cold Email Platform

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

3.2 sec

About Website

Welcome to reply.io homepage info - get ready to check Reply best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about reply.io

Automate sales outreach, find qualified leads, and book more meetings with Reply.io’s AI-powered platform. Multichannel campaigns, B2B database, analytics, and CRM integrations streamline your sales p...

Visit reply.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Reply.io page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reply.io performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,410 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value40.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reply.io

121 ms

reply.io

306 ms

main_js

613 ms

profitwell.js

23 ms

reb2b.js.gz

280 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Reply.io, 2% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to P.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (692 ms) belongs to the original domain Reply.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 605.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

5.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reply.io main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 221.3 kB

  • Original 253.6 kB
  • After minification 195.0 kB
  • After compression 32.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 58.6 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 221.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 383.6 kB

  • Original 5.8 MB
  • After minification 5.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reply images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 112 B

  • Original 21.3 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 21.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 10 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (33%)

Requests Now

104

After Optimization

70

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reply. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

reply.io accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

reply.io best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

reply.io SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reply.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reply.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reply. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: