Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

150 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

384 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Responsivepath content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about responsivepath.com

Buy the domain name ResponsivePath.com and launch your business with a premium domain and a high quality logo.

Visit responsivepath.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Responsivepath.com page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

responsivepath.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value820 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

responsivepath.com

150 ms

responsivepath

690 ms

82 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

18 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Responsivepath.com, 83% (53 requests) were made to Brandbucket.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Refersion.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (903 ms) relates to the external source Brandbucket.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 219.0 kB (44%)

Content Size

493.7 kB

After Optimization

274.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Responsivepath.com main page is 493.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 284.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 209.5 kB

  • Original 284.8 kB
  • After minification 284.8 kB
  • After compression 75.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 209.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 152.8 kB
  • After minification 150.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Responsivepath images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 56.1 kB
  • After minification 56.1 kB
  • After compression 48.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (42%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Responsivepath. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

responsivepath.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

responsivepath.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

responsivepath.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Responsivepath.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Responsivepath.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Responsivepath. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: