Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

reticularnoise.com

Acondicionamiento acústico y sonorización | Reticular Noise

Page Load Speed

24.2 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

22.7 sec

Page Rendered

290 ms

About Website

Welcome to reticularnoise.com homepage info - get ready to check Reticular Noise best content right away, or after learning these important things about reticularnoise.com

Nuestra empresa se dedica al estudio y adecuación de espacios para resolver todo tipo de problemas acústicos. ¡Llámenos y pida presupuesto!

Visit reticularnoise.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reticularnoise.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 23 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

reticularnoise.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.3 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.213

58/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.reticularnoise.com

1224 ms

analytics.js

9 ms

autoptimize_a449187e8f276e9f3a00f3c747203db6.css

229 ms

css

24 ms

jquery.js

452 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Reticularnoise.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) relates to the external source Dev.optimizaclick.es.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.3 kB (2%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reticularnoise.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 809.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 30.3 kB
  • After minification 30.2 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 913 B

  • Original 809.4 kB
  • After minification 808.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reticular Noise images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 168 B

  • Original 220.1 kB
  • After minification 220.1 kB
  • After compression 219.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 171 B

  • Original 37.4 kB
  • After minification 37.4 kB
  • After compression 37.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reticularnoise.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (29%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reticular Noise. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

reticularnoise.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

reticularnoise.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

reticularnoise.com SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reticularnoise.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Reticularnoise.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reticular Noise. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: