Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

retrofitting.ir

موسسه مقاوم سازی و بهسازی لرزه ای ایران – صفحه اصلی

Page Load Speed

13.9 sec in total

First Response

4 sec

Resources Loaded

9.6 sec

Page Rendered

268 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Retrofitting content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about retrofitting.ir

موسسه مقاوم سازی و بهسازی لرزه ای ایران تحت مجوز شماره 082209073/2963 سازمان های مردم نهاد

Visit retrofitting.ir

Key Findings

We analyzed Retrofitting.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 4 sec and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

retrofitting.ir performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,540 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.371

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

retrofitting.ir

4027 ms

bdt-uikit.rtl.css

360 ms

ep-helper.rtl.css

545 ms

frontend.css

546 ms

style.min.css

551 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Retrofitting.ir, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) belongs to the original domain Retrofitting.ir.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 379.7 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Retrofitting.ir main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 306.4 kB

  • Original 339.8 kB
  • After minification 322.9 kB
  • After compression 33.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 306.4 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 73.4 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Retrofitting images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (57%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

33

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Retrofitting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

retrofitting.ir accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

retrofitting.ir best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

retrofitting.ir SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retrofitting.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Retrofitting.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Retrofitting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: