Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

retropaper.net

RETROPAPER: Preserving History One Page at a Time: We sell high quality digital reproductions of vintage ads and catalogs

Page Load Speed

266 ms in total

First Response

22 ms

Resources Loaded

126 ms

Page Rendered

118 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing RETROPAPER content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about retropaper.net

RETROPAPER: We sell high quality digital reproductions of vintage ads and catalogs, specializing in asbestos literature and product information.

Visit retropaper.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Retropaper.net page load time and found that the first response time was 22 ms and then it took 244 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

retropaper.net performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

retropaper.net

22 ms

header26-776x134.jpg

6 ms

navbar-0-active-35398.png

10 ms

navbar-1-inactive-34832.png

10 ms

Catalogs2-150x112.jpg

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Retropaper.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Paypalobjects.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (22 ms) belongs to the original domain Retropaper.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.5 kB (19%)

Content Size

264.7 kB

After Optimization

213.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Retropaper.net main page is 264.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 230.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 34.8 kB
  • After minification 30.8 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 230.0 kB
  • After minification 207.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RETROPAPER images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (50%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

21

  • Images

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RETROPAPER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

retropaper.net accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

retropaper.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

retropaper.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retropaper.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Retropaper.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RETROPAPER. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: