Access revesalon.net. Over 100 years combined experience in Sales & Customer Service

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

revesalon.net

177 ms

main.min.css

251 ms

site-origin.min.css

254 ms

style.min.css

253 ms

styles.css

251 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Revesalon.net, 81% (30 requests) were made to Livingstonclark.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (370 ms) relates to the external source Livingstonclark.com.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Revesalon.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 111.1 kB

Original 135.8 kB
After minification 134.1 kB
After compression 24.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Revesalon images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 72 B

Original 49.6 kB
After minification 49.6 kB
After compression 49.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 125 B

Original 13.0 kB
After minification 13.0 kB
After compression 12.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Revesalon.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Revesalon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.