Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

rexaline.com

Rexaline

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

682 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rexaline content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rexaline.com

Rexaline, retient l'eau qui retient la jeunesse, grâce à son complexe unique, le DUO D'ACIDE HYALURONIQUE, né d'une découverte au sein du laboratoire AG.

Visit rexaline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rexaline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rexaline.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,980 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

en

1008 ms

consent.js

196 ms

js

69 ms

gtm.js

122 ms

js

147 ms

Our browser made a total of 352 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Rexaline.com, 72% (253 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 1% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rexaline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (3%)

Content Size

63.7 MB

After Optimization

61.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Rexaline.com main page is 63.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 62.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 592.2 kB

  • Original 681.0 kB
  • After minification 664.4 kB
  • After compression 88.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 592.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 62.4 MB
  • After minification 61.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rexaline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 533.6 kB
  • After minification 533.6 kB
  • After compression 520.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 42.1 kB
  • After compression 37.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rexaline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 93 (27%)

Requests Now

344

After Optimization

251

The browser has sent 344 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rexaline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rexaline.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rexaline.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rexaline.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rexaline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rexaline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rexaline. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: