Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

rgfstaffing.com

RGF Staffing: connecting individuals and businesses - RGF Staffing

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

291 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

546 ms

About Website

Welcome to rgfstaffing.com homepage info - get ready to check RGF Staffing best content right away, or after learning these important things about rgfstaffing.com

We are constantly seeking to bring ‘Opportunities for Life’, by connecting employees and employers, and offering both a multitude of choices.

Visit rgfstaffing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rgfstaffing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 291 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rgfstaffing.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value960 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rgfstaffing.com

291 ms

rgfstaffing.com

836 ms

WebResource.axd

184 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

371 ms

ScriptResource.axd

383 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Rgfstaffing.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (836 ms) belongs to the original domain Rgfstaffing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 167.4 kB (17%)

Content Size

986.0 kB

After Optimization

818.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rgfstaffing.com main page is 986.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 874.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 64.8 kB

  • Original 77.5 kB
  • After minification 68.9 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 102.0 kB

  • Original 874.8 kB
  • After minification 772.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RGF Staffing needs image optimization as it can save up to 102.0 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 574 B

  • Original 33.8 kB
  • After minification 33.8 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (17%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RGF Staffing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

rgfstaffing.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rgfstaffing.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rgfstaffing.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgfstaffing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rgfstaffing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RGF Staffing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: