Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

richardrestak.com

- Home

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

184 ms

Resources Loaded

749 ms

Page Rendered

142 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Richardrestak content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about richardrestak.com

Welcome to ! Here you will find information about the services at our practice in Washington DC.

Visit richardrestak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Richardrestak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 891 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richardrestak.com performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.richardrestak.com

184 ms

style.css

69 ms

theming.css

43 ms

web.css

70 ms

common,shoppingbasket

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Richardrestak.com, 32% (12 requests) were made to Cdn.initial-website.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to 201.sb.mywebsite-editor.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (270 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.initial-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 57.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

243.3 kB

After Optimization

186.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richardrestak.com main page is 243.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 155.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 36.9 kB

  • Original 44.0 kB
  • After minification 41.6 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 155.0 kB
  • After minification 155.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardrestak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 19.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardrestak.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (34%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardrestak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

richardrestak.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

richardrestak.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

richardrestak.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardrestak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardrestak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richardrestak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: