Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 1

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

ridgeline-roofing.com

Roofing Company in Nashville, TN, Huntsville, AL & Savannah, GA | Ridgeline Roofing & Restoration

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

129 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

829 ms

About Website

Welcome to ridgeline-roofing.com homepage info - get ready to check Ridgeline Roofing best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ridgeline-roofing.com

In search of a high-quality roofing company serving Nashville, TN, Huntsville, AL, & Savannah, GA? Contact Ridgeline Roofing & Restoration for a free estimate today!

Visit ridgeline-roofing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ridgeline-roofing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ridgeline-roofing.com performance score

1

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value34.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10,080 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.162

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value41.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ridgeline-roofing.com

129 ms

98c625b3-1181-4c08-a54a-0e68c8cec357.css

69 ms

pum-site-styles.css

38 ms

02032dcb-17cd-4951-b5ce-f8c6cae737a4.css

79 ms

745993043f.js

122 ms

Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Ridgeline-roofing.com, 33% (38 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (15 requests) were made to Hb.wpmucdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 869.2 kB (23%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ridgeline-roofing.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 157.6 kB

  • Original 187.9 kB
  • After minification 179.3 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 540.7 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ridgeline Roofing needs image optimization as it can save up to 540.7 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 135.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.7 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 232.3 kB
  • After minification 232.3 kB
  • After compression 197.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridgeline-roofing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (67%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridgeline Roofing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ridgeline-roofing.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ridgeline-roofing.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ridgeline-roofing.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridgeline-roofing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ridgeline-roofing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ridgeline Roofing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: