Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

ringler.de

IBR Leiterplatten GmbH & Co. KG | Ringler | Leiterplattenexperte

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

412 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

135 ms

About Website

Welcome to ringler.de homepage info - get ready to check Ringler best content right away, or after learning these important things about ringler.de

IBR Leiterplatten GmbH & Co. KG – 30 Jahre IBR seit 1989 ✔️preiswert ✓ freundlich ✓ kompetent ✓ Kleinserien & Serien ✓ ➔ Jetzt informieren!

Visit ringler.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Ringler.de page load time and found that the first response time was 412 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ringler.de performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ringler.de

412 ms

www.ibr-leiterplatten.de

1140 ms

js

64 ms

style.min.css

99 ms

plyr.css

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ringler.de, 96% (78 requests) were made to Ibr-leiterplatten.de and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Ibr-leiterplatten.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 90.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

988.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ringler.de main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 398.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 79.2 kB

  • Original 100.3 kB
  • After minification 97.3 kB
  • After compression 21.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 398.0 kB
  • After minification 392.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ringler images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 439 B

  • Original 368.3 kB
  • After minification 368.3 kB
  • After compression 367.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 211.6 kB
  • After minification 210.5 kB
  • After compression 206.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ringler.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (76%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ringler. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ringler.de accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ringler.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ringler.de SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ringler.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ringler.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ringler. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: