Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

ripleydesign.com

Bay Area Landscape Architecture & Land Planning | Ripley Design Group

Page Load Speed

630 ms in total

First Response

139 ms

Resources Loaded

431 ms

Page Rendered

60 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ripley Design content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ripleydesign.com

We are an award-winning Bay Area Landscape Architecture firm specializing in Master Planned Communities, Multi-Family Housing and Residential Landscaping.

Visit ripleydesign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ripleydesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 491 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ripleydesign.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ripleydesign.com

139 ms

www.ripleydesign.com

161 ms

verdana.css

65 ms

ripley-design-group-logo-800.png

123 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ripleydesign.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (161 ms) belongs to the original domain Ripleydesign.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 kB (12%)

Content Size

12.0 kB

After Optimization

10.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ripleydesign.com main page is 12.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 885 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 551 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 204 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 885 B or 62% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 42 B

  • Original 9.8 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ripley Design images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 559 B

  • Original 770 B
  • After minification 625 B
  • After compression 211 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ripleydesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 559 B or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ripley Design. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ripleydesign.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

ripleydesign.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

ripleydesign.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ripleydesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ripleydesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ripley Design. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: