Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

ritterwerk.de

Küchengeräte und Haushaltsgeräte „made in Germany“ - ritter

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

286 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

244 ms

About Website

Visit ritterwerk.de now to see the best up-to-date Ritter Werk content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ritterwerk.de

ritterwerk steht für hochwertige Produkte „made in germany“. Vom Toaster über Wasserkocher bis zu Allesschneidern sind wir in jedem Haushalt vertreten. Erfahren Sie mehr über unser mittelständisches M...

Visit ritterwerk.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Ritterwerk.de page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ritterwerk.de performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ritterwerk.de

286 ms

ritterwerk.de

388 ms

www.ritterwerk.de

236 ms

www.ritterwerk.de

793 ms

font-awesome.min.css

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Ritterwerk.de, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritterwerk.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (27%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ritterwerk.de main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 62.2 kB

  • Original 84.9 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 333.6 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ritter Werk needs image optimization as it can save up to 333.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 493.9 kB

  • Original 730.1 kB
  • After minification 687.6 kB
  • After compression 236.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 493.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 228.7 kB

  • Original 296.9 kB
  • After minification 247.7 kB
  • After compression 68.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritterwerk.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 228.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (30%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

49

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritter Werk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ritterwerk.de accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ritterwerk.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ritterwerk.de SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritterwerk.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritterwerk.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritter Werk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: