Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

riversand.com

Riversand PIM and MDM | Syndigo

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

161 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

About Website

Visit riversand.com now to see the best up-to-date Riversand content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about riversand.com

Riversand was acquired by Syndigo in 2021. Syndigo MDM and Syndigo PIM solutions make it easier to manage and govern high-quality data.

Visit riversand.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Riversand.com page load time and found that the first response time was 161 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riversand.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,060 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

161 ms

gtm.js

95 ms

localize.js

33 ms

autoptimize_578e70d146794f3f6e78c6b44ee01162.css

53 ms

forms2.min.js

176 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Riversand.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Global.localizecdn.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (596 ms) relates to the external source Pages.syndigo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 194.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Riversand.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 53.3 kB

  • Original 68.6 kB
  • After minification 68.6 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riversand images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 141.2 kB

  • Original 279.4 kB
  • After minification 279.4 kB
  • After compression 138.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 141.2 kB or 51% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (41%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riversand. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

riversand.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

SEO Factors

riversand.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riversand.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riversand.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riversand. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: