Access rmalderton.com. Product Design, Mould Tool Design, RM Alderton Designs

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

rmalderton.com

174 ms

style.css

80 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

160 ms

urchin.js

9 ms

__utm.gif

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Rmalderton.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (237 ms) belongs to the original domain Rmalderton.com.

Content Size

82.6 kB

After Optimization

65.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Rmalderton.com main page is 82.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 53.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

Original 18.5 kB
After minification 16.1 kB
After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 731 B

Original 53.2 kB
After minification 52.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RM Alderton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

Original 9.5 kB
After minification 9.5 kB
After compression 7.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 395 B

Original 1.4 kB
After minification 1.4 kB
After compression 1.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmalderton.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 395 B or 28% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RM Alderton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.