Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

rockstaff.com

rockstaff.com

Page Load Speed

14.1 sec in total

First Response

7.1 sec

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

0 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rockstaff content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rockstaff.com

Visit rockstaff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rockstaff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7.1 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rockstaff.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

rockstaff.com

7063 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rockstaff.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rockstaff.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.4 kB (7%)

Content Size

421.8 kB

After Optimization

391.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rockstaff.com main page is 421.8 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 290.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 23 B

  • Original 127 B
  • After minification 127 B
  • After compression 104 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23 B or 18% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 21.0 kB

  • Original 33.8 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rockstaff needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 62% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 290.2 kB
  • After minification 290.2 kB
  • After compression 288.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 97.7 kB
  • After minification 97.7 kB
  • After compression 90.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockstaff.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Network Requests Diagram

SEO Factors

rockstaff.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockstaff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rockstaff.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rockstaff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: