Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

roosterfish.media

Roosterfish is Charlotte NC's #1 Real Estate Video Company

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

833 ms

About Website

Welcome to roosterfish.media homepage info - get ready to check Roosterfish best content right away, or after learning these important things about roosterfish.media

We're a Charlotte NC video production company specializing in high-quality real estate and drone video production.

Visit roosterfish.media

Key Findings

We analyzed Roosterfish.media page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roosterfish.media performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,910 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roosterfish.media

11 ms

roosterfish.media

2277 ms

css

69 ms

global.css

20 ms

formcraft-common.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Roosterfish.media, 31% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Roosterfish.media.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 363.4 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Roosterfish.media main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 153.8 kB

  • Original 185.2 kB
  • After minification 181.8 kB
  • After compression 31.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 153.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 162.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 987.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Roosterfish needs image optimization as it can save up to 162.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 31.0 kB

  • Original 517.2 kB
  • After minification 517.2 kB
  • After compression 486.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 15.7 kB

  • Original 143.6 kB
  • After minification 143.6 kB
  • After compression 127.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roosterfish.media needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (74%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roosterfish. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

roosterfish.media accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

roosterfish.media best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

roosterfish.media SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roosterfish.media can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roosterfish.media main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roosterfish. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: