Access roostersatl.com.

Report Summary

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value52.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value33.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,640 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.198

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value52.6 s

0/100

10%

roostersatl.com

23 ms

13120

113 ms

css2

31 ms

css2

47 ms

css2

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Roostersatl.com, 67% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 25% (3 requests) were made to Roostersmgc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (113 ms) relates to the external source Roostersmgc.com.

Content Size

8.4 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Roostersatl.com main page is 8.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 8.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

Original 5.7 kB
After minification 5.7 kB
After compression 1.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 6.4 MB

Original 8.1 MB
After minification 8.1 MB
After compression 1.7 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.4 MB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 260.9 kB

Original 310.7 kB
After minification 306.1 kB
After compression 49.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roostersatl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 260.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roostersatl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

N/A
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roostersatl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Roostersatl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Roostersatl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: