Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

roostinridge.com

Roostin Ridge, Taxidermy Pedestals & Taxidermy Bases

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

504 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Roostin Ridge content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about roostinridge.com

Supplier of taxidermy pedestals & taxidermy bases. Discover The Difference Today. Online Ordering & Design of Your Taxidermy Displays

Visit roostinridge.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Roostinridge.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roostinridge.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,270 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roostinridge.com

147 ms

roostinridge.com

488 ms

stylesheet.css

127 ms

stylesheet_mega_menu.css

195 ms

jquery.js

265 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Roostinridge.com, 6% (7 requests) were made to Static.olark.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Roostinridge.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.7 kB (3%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Roostinridge.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 89.7 kB

  • Original 102.9 kB
  • After minification 66.1 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 36.7 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 4.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roostin Ridge images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 20.9 kB

  • Original 245.9 kB
  • After minification 245.7 kB
  • After compression 224.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 83.0 kB
  • After minification 83.0 kB
  • After compression 71.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roostinridge.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (15%)

Requests Now

111

After Optimization

94

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roostin Ridge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

roostinridge.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

roostinridge.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

roostinridge.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roostinridge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roostinridge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Roostin Ridge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: