Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

royallabel.com

Royal Label Printing Company Boston | Medical, Digital Labels & More

Page Load Speed

848 ms in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

463 ms

Page Rendered

308 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Royal Label content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about royallabel.com

For over 60 years Royal Label has provided high-quality, custom labels for a variety of industries from medical to consumer & more. Call today for a free quote!

Visit royallabel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Royallabel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 771 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

royallabel.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

royallabel.com

77 ms

royallabel.com

53 ms

www.royallabel.com

51 ms

www.royallabel.com

121 ms

email-decode.min.js

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Royallabel.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (121 ms) belongs to the original domain Royallabel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 232.1 kB (79%)

Content Size

295.7 kB

After Optimization

63.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Royallabel.com main page is 295.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 291.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 232.1 kB

  • Original 291.1 kB
  • After minification 288.8 kB
  • After compression 59.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 232.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 68 B
  • After minification 68 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royal Label images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 29 B

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 4.5 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal Label. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

royallabel.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

royallabel.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

royallabel.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royallabel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royallabel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: