Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

rrtc.net

USATF/RRTC - Course Measurement & Certification

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

200 ms

Resources Loaded

848 ms

Page Rendered

137 ms

About Website

Welcome to rrtc.net homepage info - get ready to check RRTC best content right away, or after learning these important things about rrtc.net

The USA Track & Field Road Running Technical Council (RRTC) oversees course measurement and certification in the United States

Visit rrtc.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rrtc.net page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 985 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rrtc.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rrtc.net

200 ms

rrtc.net

321 ms

redirection-mobile.js

91 ms

usatf_logo.gif

78 ms

right_triangle.png

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rrtc.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (321 ms) belongs to the original domain Rrtc.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 16.8 kB (52%)

Content Size

32.3 kB

After Optimization

15.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Rrtc.net main page is 32.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 19.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 19.4 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 12.9 kB
  • After minification 10.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RRTC needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RRTC. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rrtc.net accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

rrtc.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rrtc.net SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rrtc.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rrtc.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RRTC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: