Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

316 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

95 ms

About Website

Visit rudevice.ru now to see the best up-to-date Rudevice content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rudevice.ru

Visit rudevice.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Rudevice.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 316 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rudevice.ru performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,700 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.073

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rudevice.ru

316 ms

rudevice.ru

506 ms

style.min.css

334 ms

logo_2-1.png

378 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Rudevice.ru, 5% (1 request) were made to Myfallout-shelter.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Myfallout-shelter.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 264.5 kB (33%)

Content Size

793.4 kB

After Optimization

528.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Rudevice.ru main page is 793.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 414.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 260.4 kB

  • Original 302.1 kB
  • After minification 301.4 kB
  • After compression 41.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 260.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 414.6 kB
  • After minification 410.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rudevice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 34.2 kB
  • After minification 34.2 kB
  • After compression 34.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 42.5 kB
  • After minification 42.5 kB
  • After compression 42.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rudevice.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rudevice. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rudevice.ru accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

rudevice.ru best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rudevice.ru SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rudevice.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Russian. Our system also found out that Rudevice.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rudevice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: