Access ruhm.com. RUHM Marketing | Creating content that's strategic by design.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

ruhm.com

180 ms

ruhm.com

305 ms

style.min.css

70 ms

theme.min.css

138 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

219 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Ruhm.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (554 ms) belongs to the original domain Ruhm.com.

Content Size

315.0 kB

After Optimization

280.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Ruhm.com main page is 315.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 146.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

Original 41.0 kB
After minification 40.2 kB
After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 542 B

Original 28.2 kB
After minification 27.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RUHM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 300 B

Original 146.9 kB
After minification 146.9 kB
After compression 146.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

Original 98.9 kB
After minification 98.8 kB
After compression 97.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ruhm.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RUHM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.