Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

runloop.com

Runloop · Developer of Seconds Interval Timer | Runloop

Page Load Speed

699 ms in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

527 ms

Page Rendered

129 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Runloop content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about runloop.com

Runloop is the developer of Seconds Interval Timer and HeavySet for iOS. Runloop is based in the United Kingdom.

Visit runloop.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Runloop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 656 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

runloop.com performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

runloop.com

43 ms

www.runloop.com

256 ms

analytics.js

18 ms

webpack-runtime-645eecb49c8e02b412ee.js

137 ms

app-6836a83f6290e0cc3203.js

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Runloop.com, 8% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (256 ms) belongs to the original domain Runloop.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 147.9 kB (72%)

Content Size

205.1 kB

After Optimization

57.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Runloop.com main page is 205.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 184.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 147.8 kB

  • Original 184.1 kB
  • After minification 184.1 kB
  • After compression 36.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (82%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

2

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Runloop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

runloop.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

runloop.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

runloop.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runloop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Runloop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Runloop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: