Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

runscanner.net

RunScanner freeware startup, hijack and malware analyzer

Page Load Speed

711 ms in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

412 ms

Page Rendered

210 ms

About Website

Visit runscanner.net now to see the best up-to-date Run Scanner content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about runscanner.net

Runscanner is freeware startup analyzer containing a file list of dll exe and sys process files

Visit runscanner.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Runscanner.net page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 622 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

runscanner.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

runscanner.net

89 ms

runscanner.css

21 ms

counter.js

8 ms

newsmall.gif

11 ms

sprite.png

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Runscanner.net, 18% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Download.runscanner.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (185 ms) relates to the external source Download.runscanner.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 42.4 kB (17%)

Content Size

244.7 kB

After Optimization

202.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Runscanner.net main page is 244.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 201.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 12.4 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 21.4 kB

  • Original 201.8 kB
  • After minification 180.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Run Scanner needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 23.0 kB
  • After minification 23.0 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runscanner.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (63%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Run Scanner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

runscanner.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runscanner.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Runscanner.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Run Scanner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: